Here are some possible reasons behind the differing results. Back in 2010, no one would publish “smiling works great in dating photos!! The over-sifting of the data set likely obscured other trends that were more responsible for profile success than the photo characteristics the study claimed to be measuring.For instance, it’s possible that the men in the top 20% of attractiveness were attractive and smiling, and the men in the bottom 20% of attractiveness were unattractive and not smiling.Just as many young adults today, I too have tried social media online dating sites.Whether you're on there in search of a potential significant other or just a hook up, it's nice to get to meet new people in a way our parents never had the opportunity to do.In fact, the online dating world is so new to us that fathers don't know how to educate their sons on what the proper way to go about online dating is.
If your career is insanely unbelievable don't be surprised if a girl calls you fake.
But, the men countered, women don’t necessarily know what they want.
After all, Ok Cupid’s findings were based on behavior, not just talk, right? Like everyone else, we believed in Ok Cupid’s conclusions. But every time we looked into this, we found the same thing: daters who used Photofeeler for photo testing were getting right-swipes like never before.
This leaves only smiling ugly guys at the bottom of the spectrum and grumpy hot guys at the top, making it look like being grumpy makes you hot.
Building on the previous point, there’s the question of how many pictures of men not smiling and not making eye contact were in the data set to begin with.